Rethinking UX for Sustainable Science Gateways: Orientations from Practice
By: Paul C. Parsons
Potential Business Impact:
Makes science websites last longer and help more people.
As science gateways mature, sustainability has become a central concern for funders, developers, and institutions. Although user experience (UX) is increasingly acknowledged as vital, it is often approached narrowly--limited to interface usability or deferred until late in development. This paper argues that UX should be understood not as a discrete feature or evaluation stage but as a design-oriented perspective for reasoning about sustainability. Drawing on principles from user-centered design and systems thinking, this view recognizes that infrastructure, staffing, community engagement, and development timelines all shape how gateways are experienced and maintained over time. Based on an interview study and consulting experience with more than 65 gateway projects, the paper identifies three recurring orientations toward UX--ad hoc, project-based, and strategic--that characterize how teams engage with users and integrate design thinking into their workflows. These orientations are not a maturity model but a reflective lens for understanding how UX is positioned within gateway practice. Reframing UX as a structural dimension of sustainability highlights its role in building adaptable, community-aligned, and enduring scientific infrastructure.
Similar Papers
Towards an Architectural Perspective for Sustainability: Bundle the Needs from Industry
Software Engineering
Helps build eco-friendly computer programs.
Coping with Uncertainty in UX Design Practice: Practitioner Strategies and Judgment
Human-Computer Interaction
Helps designers solve tricky problems when things change.
Bridging the Gap Between Modern UX Design and Particle Accelerator Control Room Interfaces
Accelerator Physics
Makes controlling big machines easier and safer.