Understanding Reader Perception Shifts upon Disclosure of AI Authorship
By: Hiroki Nakano , Jo Takezawa , Fabrice Matulic and more
Potential Business Impact:
Telling people AI wrote it makes them trust it less.
As AI writing support becomes ubiquitous, how disclosing its use affects reader perception remains a critical, underexplored question. We conducted a study with 261 participants to examine how revealing varying levels of AI involvement shifts author impressions across six distinct communicative acts. Our analysis of 990 responses shows that disclosure generally erodes perceptions of trustworthiness, caring, competence, and likability, with the sharpest declines in social and interpersonal writing. A thematic analysis of participants' feedback links these negative shifts to a perceived loss of human sincerity, diminished author effort, and the contextual inappropriateness of AI. Conversely, we find that higher AI literacy mitigates these negative perceptions, leading to greater tolerance or even appreciation for AI use. Our results highlight the nuanced social dynamics of AI-mediated authorship and inform design implications for creating transparent, context-sensitive writing systems that better preserve trust and authenticity.
Similar Papers
Penalizing Transparency? How AI Disclosure and Author Demographics Shape Human and AI Judgments About Writing
Computers and Society
AI disclosure hurts writing quality for all.
What Shapes Writers' Decisions to Disclose AI Use?
Human-Computer Interaction
Helps tell if computers wrote something.
AI Personalization Paradox: Personalized AI Increases Superficial Engagement in Reading while Undermines Autonomy and Ownership in Writing
Human-Computer Interaction
AI writing tools make writers rely on them too much.