Tracking Walls, Take-It-Or-Leave-It Choices, the GDPR, and the ePrivacy Regulation
By: Frederik J. Zuiderveen Borgesius , Sanne Kruikemeier , Sophie C. Boerman and more
Potential Business Impact:
Stops websites forcing you to agree to tracking.
On the internet, we encounter take-it-or-leave-it choices regarding our privacy on a daily basis. In Europe, online tracking for targeted advertising generally requires the internet users' consent to be lawful. Some websites use a tracking wall, a barrier that visitors can only pass if they consent to tracking by third parties. When confronted with such a tracking wall, many people click 'I agree' to tracking. A survey that we conducted shows that most people find tracking walls unfair and unacceptable. We analyse under which conditions the ePrivacy Directive and the General Data Protection Regulation allow tracking walls. We provide a list of circumstances to assess when a tracking wall makes consent invalid. We also explore how the EU lawmaker could regulate tracking walls, for instance in the ePrivacy Regulation. It should be seriously considered to ban tracking walls, at least in certain circumstances.
Similar Papers
Can the GPC standard eliminate consent banners in the EU?
Computers and Society
Lets people automatically block online tracking.
Informed Consent: We Can Do Better to Defend Privacy
Computers and Society
Protects your online privacy better than just asking.
Personal Data Processing for Behavioural Targeting: Which Legal Basis?
Computers and Society
Protects your online privacy from targeted ads.