Inconsistency thresholds revisited: The effect of the graph associated with incomplete pairwise comparisons
By: Kolos Csaba Ágoston, László Csató
Potential Business Impact:
Finds errors when people compare things.
The inconsistency of pairwise comparisons remains difficult to interpret in the absence of acceptability thresholds. The popular 10% cut-off rule proposed by Saaty has recently been applied to incomplete pairwise comparison matrices, which contain some unknown comparisons. This paper revises these inconsistency thresholds: we uncover that they depend not only on the size of the matrix and the number of missing entries, but also on the undirected graph whose edges represent the known pairwise comparisons. Therefore, using our exact thresholds is especially important if the filling in patterns coincide for a large number of matrices, as has been recommended in the literature. The strong association between the new threshold values and the spectral radius of the representing graph is also demonstrated. Our results can be integrated into software to continuously monitor inconsistency during the collection of pairwise comparisons and immediately detect potential errors.
Similar Papers
PCA recovery thresholds in low-rank matrix inference with sparse noise
Machine Learning (Stat)
Finds hidden patterns in messy data.
Pairwise Comparisons without Stochastic Transitivity: Model, Theory and Applications
Machine Learning (Stat)
Better predicts winners without assuming a perfect ranking.
Evaluating Singular Value Thresholds for DNN Weight Matrices based on Random Matrix Theory
Machine Learning (Stat)
Cleans up computer brains for better learning.