Bayesian model selection and misspecification testing in imaging inverse problems only from noisy and partial measurements
By: Tom Sprunck, Marcelo Pereyra, Tobias Liaudat
Potential Business Impact:
Helps computers pick the best way to fix blurry pictures.
Modern imaging techniques heavily rely on Bayesian statistical models to address difficult image reconstruction and restoration tasks. This paper addresses the objective evaluation of such models in settings where ground truth is unavailable, with a focus on model selection and misspecification diagnosis. Existing unsupervised model evaluation methods are often unsuitable for computational imaging due to their high computational cost and incompatibility with modern image priors defined implicitly via machine learning models. We herein propose a general methodology for unsupervised model selection and misspecification detection in Bayesian imaging sciences, based on a novel combination of Bayesian cross-validation and data fission, a randomized measurement splitting technique. The approach is compatible with any Bayesian imaging sampler, including diffusion and plug-and-play samplers. We demonstrate the methodology through experiments involving various scoring rules and types of model misspecification, where we achieve excellent selection and detection accuracy with a low computational cost.
Similar Papers
Detecting Model Misspecification in Bayesian Inverse Problems via Variational Gradient Descent
Methodology
Finds when computer models are wrong.
Inference in the presence of model-form uncertainties: Leveraging a prediction-oriented approach to improve uncertainty characterization
Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science
Makes scientific predictions more trustworthy and accurate.
Comparing Misspecified Models with Big Data: A Variational Bayesian Perspective
Econometrics
Helps computers pick the right data faster.