Uncertainties in Physics-informed Inverse Problems: The Hidden Risk in Scientific AI
By: Yoh-ichi Mototake, Makoto Sasaki
Potential Business Impact:
Finds hidden rules in science using smart computers.
Physics-informed machine learning (PIML) integrates partial differential equations (PDEs) into machine learning models to solve inverse problems, such as estimating coefficient functions (e.g., the Hamiltonian function) that characterize physical systems. This framework enables data-driven understanding and prediction of complex physical phenomena. While coefficient functions in PIML are typically estimated on the basis of predictive performance, physics as a discipline does not rely solely on prediction accuracy to evaluate models. For example, Kepler's heliocentric model was favored owing to small discrepancies in planetary motion, despite its similar predictive accuracy to the geocentric model. This highlights the inherent uncertainties in data-driven model inference and the scientific importance of selecting physically meaningful solutions. In this paper, we propose a framework to quantify and analyze such uncertainties in the estimation of coefficient functions in PIML. We apply our framework to reduced model of magnetohydrodynamics and our framework shows that there are uncertainties, and unique identification is possible with geometric constraints. Finally, we confirm that we can estimate the reduced model uniquely by incorporating these constraints.
Similar Papers
Uncertainty-Aware Diagnostics for Physics-Informed Machine Learning
Machine Learning (Stat)
Helps AI learn science rules better.
Plug-and-Play Physics-informed Learning using Uncertainty Quantified Port-Hamiltonian Models
Robotics
Helps robots predict danger, even when surprised.
Physics-Informed Machine Learning in Biomedical Science and Engineering
Machine Learning (CS)
Teaches computers to understand body science rules.