SWE-Compass: Towards Unified Evaluation of Agentic Coding Abilities for Large Language Models
By: Jingxuan Xu , Ken Deng , Weihao Li and more
Potential Business Impact:
Tests AI's ability to write and fix code.
Evaluating large language models (LLMs) for software engineering has been limited by narrow task coverage, language bias, and insufficient alignment with real-world developer workflows. Existing benchmarks often focus on algorithmic problems or Python-centric bug fixing, leaving critical dimensions of software engineering underexplored. To address these gaps, we introduce SWE-Compass1, a comprehensive benchmark that unifies heterogeneous code-related evaluations into a structured and production-aligned framework. SWE-Compass spans 8 task types, 8 programming scenarios, and 10 programming languages, with 2000 high-quality instances curated from authentic GitHub pull requests and refined through systematic filtering and validation. We benchmark ten state-of-the-art LLMs under two agentic frameworks, SWE-Agent and Claude Code, revealing a clear hierarchy of difficulty across task types, languages, and scenarios. Moreover, by aligning evaluation with real-world developer practices, SWE-Compass provides a rigorous and reproducible foundation for diagnosing and advancing agentic coding capabilities in large language models.
Similar Papers
SWE-Compass: Towards Unified Evaluation of Agentic Coding Abilities for Large Language Models
Software Engineering
Tests AI's ability to write and fix code.
SWE-Compass: Towards Unified Evaluation of Agentic Coding Abilities for Large Language Models
Software Engineering
Tests AI's ability to write and fix code.
SWE-fficiency: Can Language Models Optimize Real-World Repositories on Real Workloads?
Software Engineering
Helps computers fix slow code automatically.