Estimating Treatment Effects with Missings Not At Random in the Estimand Framework using Causal Inference
By: A. Ruiz de Villa, Ll. Badiella
Potential Business Impact:
Fixes broken study results when data is missing.
The analysis of randomized trials is often complicated by the occurrence of intercurrent events and missing values. Even though there are different strategies to address missing values it is still common to require missing values imputation. In the present article we explore the estimation of treatment effects in RCTs from a causal inference perspective under different missing data mechanisms with a particular emphasis on missings not at random (MNAR). By modelling the missingness process with directed acylcic graphs and patient-specific potential response variables, we present a new approach to obtain an unbiased estimation of treatment effects without needing to impute missing values. Additionally, we provide a formal that the average conditional log-odds ratio is a robust measure even under MNAR missing values if adjusted by sufficient confounders.
Similar Papers
Robustness intervals for competing risks analysis with causes of failure missing not at random
Methodology
Makes medical studies more trustworthy with missing data.
Incorporating Missingness in a Framework for Generating Realistic Synthetic Randomized Controlled Trial Data
Other Statistics
Creates fake data that includes missing pieces.
Discussion of "Causal and counterfactual views of missing data models" by Razieh Nabi, Rohit Bhattacharya, Ilya Shpitser, & James M. Robins
Methodology
Fixes data when some information is missing.