Score: 1

Assessing On-Demand Mobility Services and Policy Impacts: A Case Study from Chengdu, China

Published: November 8, 2025 | arXiv ID: 2511.06074v2

By: Youkai Wu , Zhaoxia Guo , Qi Liu and more

Potential Business Impact:

Ride-hailing cars are much better than street taxis.

Business Areas:
Ride Sharing Transportation

The rapid expansion of ride-hailing services has significantly reshaped urban on-demand mobility patterns, but it still remains unclear how they perform relative to traditional street-hailing services and how effective are related policy interventions. This study presents a simulation framework integrating a graph theory-based trip-vehicle matching mechanism with real cruising taxi operations data to simulate ride-hailing services in Chengdu, China. The performances of the two on-demand mobility service modes (i.e., ride-hailing and street-hailing) are evaluated in terms of three key performance indicators: average passenger waiting time (APWT), average deadheading miles (ADM), and average deadheading energy consumption (ADEC). We further examine the impacts of spatiotemporal characteristics and three types of policies: fleet size management, geofencing, and demand management, on the performance of ride-hailing services. Results show that under the same fleet size and trip demand as street-hailing taxis, ride-hailing services without cruising achieve substantial improvements, reducing APWT, ADM, and ADEC by 81\%, 75\%, and 72.1\%, respectively. These improvements are most pronounced during midnight low-demand hours and in remote areas such as airports. Our analysis also reveals that for ride-hailing service, (1) expanding fleet size yields diminishing marginal benefits; (2) geofencing worsens overall performance while it improves the performance of serving all trips within the city center; and (3) demand-side management targeting trips to high-attraction and low-demand areas can effectively reduce passenger waiting time without increasing deadheading costs.

Country of Origin
🇳🇴 🇭🇰 🇨🇳 Hong Kong, China, Norway

Page Count
56 pages

Category
Mathematics:
Optimization and Control