Differentially Private Rankings via Outranking Methods and Performance Data Aggregation
By: Luis Del Vasto-Terrientes
Potential Business Impact:
Keeps your online choices private when ranking things.
Multiple-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) is a sub-discipline of Operations Research that helps decision-makers in choosing, ranking, or sorting alternatives based on conflicting criteria. Over time, its application has been expanded into dynamic and data-driven domains, such as recommender systems. In these contexts, the availability and handling of personal and sensitive data can play a critical role in the decision-making process. Despite this increased reliance on sensitive data, the integration of privacy mechanisms with MCDM methods is underdeveloped. This paper introduces an integrated approach that combines MCDM outranking methods with Differential Privacy (DP), safeguarding individual contributions' privacy in ranking problems. This approach relies on a pre-processing step to aggregate multiple user evaluations into a comprehensive performance matrix. The evaluation results show a strong to very strong statistical correlation between the true rankings and their anonymized counterparts, ensuring robust privacy parameter guarantees.
Similar Papers
A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Methods
Other Statistics
Helps pick the best banks by comparing methods.
Comparing Methodologies for Ranking Alternatives: A case study in assessing bank financial performance
Other Statistics
Helps pick the best banks by comparing them fairly.
Lost in Models? Structuring Managerial Decision Support in Process Mining with Multi-criteria Decision Making
Computers and Society
Chooses best business plans from many options.