Two Americas of Well-Being: Divergent Rural-Urban Patterns of Life Satisfaction and Happiness from 2.6 B Social Media Posts
By: Stefano Maria Iacus, Giuseppe Porro
Potential Business Impact:
Shows how people feel about life and happiness.
Using 2.6 billion geolocated social-media posts (2014-2022) and a fine-tuned generative language model, we construct county-level indicators of life satisfaction and happiness for the United States. We document an apparent rural-urban paradox: rural counties express higher life satisfaction while urban counties exhibit greater happiness. We reconcile this by treating the two as distinct layers of subjective well-being, evaluative vs. hedonic, showing that each maps differently onto place, politics, and time. Republican-leaning areas appear more satisfied in evaluative terms, but partisan gaps in happiness largely flatten outside major metros, indicating context-dependent political effects. Temporal shocks dominate the hedonic layer: happiness falls sharply during 2020-2022, whereas life satisfaction moves more modestly. These patterns are robust across logistic and OLS specifications and align with well-being theory. Interpreted as associations for the population of social-media posts, the results show that large-scale, language-based indicators can resolve conflicting findings about the rural-urban divide by distinguishing the type of well-being expressed, offering a transparent, reproducible complement to traditional surveys.
Similar Papers
The Human Flourishing Geographic Index: A County-Level Dataset for the United States, 2013--2023
Computation and Language
Shows how happy people are, everywhere, every month.
Are international happiness rankings reliable?
General Economics
Makes happiness surveys more reliable worldwide.
Election and Subjective Well-Being:Evidence from the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election
General Economics
Election results hurt some people's happiness.