Why is "Chicago" Predictive of Deceptive Reviews? Using LLMs to Discover Language Phenomena from Lexical Cues
By: Jiaming Qu, Mengtian Guo, Yue Wang
Potential Business Impact:
Explains why online reviews are fake.
Deceptive reviews mislead consumers, harm businesses, and undermine trust in online marketplaces. Machine learning classifiers can learn from large amounts of training examples to effectively distinguish deceptive reviews from genuine ones. However, the distinguishing features learned by these classifiers are often subtle, fragmented, and difficult for humans to interpret. In this work, we explore using large language models (LLMs) to translate machine-learned lexical cues into human-understandable language phenomena that can differentiate deceptive reviews from genuine ones. We show that language phenomena obtained in this manner are empirically grounded in data, generalizable across similar domains, and more predictive than phenomena either in LLMs' prior knowledge or obtained through in-context learning. These language phenomena have the potential to aid people in critically assessing the credibility of online reviews in environments where deception detection classifiers are unavailable.
Similar Papers
Large Language Models as 'Hidden Persuaders': Fake Product Reviews are Indistinguishable to Humans and Machines
Computation and Language
Computers can't tell fake reviews from real ones.
Complementary Learning Approach for Text Classification using Large Language Models
Computation and Language
Helps people and computers work together better.
Beyond Prompt-Induced Lies: Investigating LLM Deception on Benign Prompts
Machine Learning (CS)
Finds when AI lies about hard problems.