Further Commentary on the Sooty Tern Optimization Algorithm and Tunicate Swarm Algorithm
By: Ngaiming Kwok
Potential Business Impact:
Algorithms have hidden math mistakes, making them unreliable.
In the article (Kudela, 2022), experimental demonstrations indicated that two Bio-/Nature inspired optimization algorithms (BNIOAs), Sooty Tern Optimization Algorithm (STOA) and Tunicate Swarm Algorithm (TSA), exhibit a zero-bias, leading to the conclusion that the claims made in the original papers were overstated. In this work, we extend the analysis by investigating the source of this bias from a probabilistic perspective. Our findings suggest that operations involving exponentiation, trigonometric functions, and divisions between random numbers are the primary causes of design flaws. These operations result in probability density distributions with a noticeable shift toward zero. Therefore, the application of these two algorithms should be approached with due caution.
Similar Papers
Socio-cognitive agent-oriented evolutionary algorithm with trust-based optimization
Neural and Evolutionary Computing
Makes computer problem-solving smarter with trust.
On the Structural and Statistical Flaws of the Exponential-Trigonometric Optimizer
Neural and Evolutionary Computing
Exposes flawed computer math, making it more honest.
Bio-Inspired Neuron Synapse Optimization for Adaptive Learning and Smart Decision-Making
Neural and Evolutionary Computing
Finds best answers faster for hard problems.