Performance comparison of 802.11mc and 802.11az Wi-Fi Fine Time Measurement protocols
By: Govind Rajendran , Kushagra Sharma , Vijayalakshmi Chetlapalli and more
Potential Business Impact:
Makes Wi-Fi find your exact spot indoors.
The need for meter level location accuracy is driving increased adoption of 802.11 mc/az Fine Time Measurement (FTM) based ranging in Wi-Fi networks. In this paper, we present a comparative study of the ranging accuracy of 802.11mc and 802.11az protocols. We examine by real world measurements the critical parameters that influence the accuracy of FTM {\it{viz.,}} channel width, interference, radio environment, and offset calibration. The measurements demonstrate that meter-level ranging accuracy can be consistently attained in line of sight environment on 80 MHz and 160 MHz channels, while an accuracy of about 5m is obtained in non-line of sight environment. It is observed that the 802.11az protocol is capable of providing better accuracy than 802.11mc even in a multipath heavy environment.
Similar Papers
Indoor Positioning with Wi-Fi Location: A Survey of IEEE 802.11mc/az/bk Fine Timing Measurement Research
Networking and Internet Architecture
Helps phones find your exact spot inside.
cmWave/FR3 Large-Scale Channel Characterization for Urban Macro/Micro and Suburban Environments
Information Theory
Improves phone signals in cities and suburbs.
Impact of Environmental Factors on LoRa 2.4 GHz Time of Flight Ranging Outdoors
Networking and Internet Architecture
Finds exact spots using radio waves.