The Effects of Remote Working on Scientific Collaboration and Impact
By: Sara Venturini , Satyaki Sikdar , Martina Mazzarello and more
Potential Business Impact:
Remote work hurts science quality, needs balance.
The COVID-19 pandemic shifted academic collaboration from in-person to remote interactions. This study explores, for the first time, the effects on scientific collaborations and impact of such a shift, comparing research output before, during, and after the pandemic. Using large-scale bibliometric data, we track the evolution of collaboration networks and the resulting impact of research over time. Our findings are twofold: first, the geographic distribution of collaborations significantly shifted, with a notable increase in cross-border partnerships after 2020, indicating a reduction in the constraints of geographic proximity. Second, despite the expansion of collaboration networks, there was a concerning decline in citation impact, suggesting that the absence of spontaneous in-person interactions-which traditionally foster deep discussions and idea exchange-negatively affected research quality. As hybrid work models in academia gain traction, this study highlights the need for universities and research organizations to carefully consider the balance between remote and in-person engagement.
Similar Papers
The effect of remote work on urban transportation emissions: evidence from 141 cities
General Economics
Working from home lowers car pollution.
The Impact of COVID-19 and Remote Work on Software Development in Thailand
Software Engineering
Thai coders stayed productive working from home.
The Intertwined Rise of Collaboration Scale, Reference Diversity, and Breakthrough Potential in Modern Science: A 40-Year Cross-Disciplinary Study
Digital Libraries
More ideas mixed together make bigger discoveries.