The role of counting quantifiers in laminar set systems
By: Rutger Campbell, Noleen Köhler
Potential Business Impact:
Turns complex group rules into simple tree maps.
Laminar set systems consist of non-crossing subsets of a universe with set inclusion essentially corresponding to the descendant relationship of a tree, the so-called laminar tree. Laminar set systems lie at the core of many graph decompositions such as modular decompositions, split decompositions, and bi-join decompositions. We show that from a laminar set system we can obtain the corresponding laminar tree by means of a monadic second order logic (MSO) transduction. This resolves an open question originally asked by Courcelle and is a satisfying resolution as MSO is the natural logic for set systems and is sufficient to define the property ``laminar''. Using results from Campbell et al. [STACS 2025], we can now obtain transductions for obtaining modular decompositions, co-trees, split decompositions and bi-join decompositions using MSO instead of CMSO. We further gain some insight into the expressive power of counting quantifiers and provide some results towards determining when counting quantifiers can be simulated in MSO in laminar set systems and when they cannot.
Similar Papers
A Cut-Free Sequent Calculus for the Analysis of Finite-Trace Properties in Concurrent Systems
Logic in Computer Science
Helps programs check themselves for errors.
On describing trees and quasi-trees from their leaves
Logic in Computer Science
Maps complex structures using simpler rules.
A General (Uniform) Relational Semantics for Sentential Logics
Logic in Computer Science
Makes many different logic systems work the same.