Sampling Permutations with Cell Probes is Hard
By: Yaroslav Alekseev , Mika Göös , Konstantin Myasnikov and more
Potential Business Impact:
Makes computers create random lists much faster.
Suppose we are given an infinite sequence of input cells, each initialized with a uniform random symbol from $[n]$. How hard is it to output a sequence in $[n]^n$ that is close to a uniform random permutation? Viola (SICOMP 2020) conjectured that if each output cell is computed by making $d$ probes to input cells, then $d\geqω(1)$. Our main result shows that, in fact, $d\geq (\log n)^{Ω(1)}$, which is tight up to the constant in the exponent. Our techniques also show that if the probes are nonadaptive, then $d\geq n^{Ω(1)}$, which is an exponential improvement over the previous nonadaptive lower bound due to Yu and Zhan (ITCS 2024). Our results also imply lower bounds against succinct data structures for storing permutations.
Similar Papers
Unifying the Landscape of Super-Logarithmic Dynamic Cell-Probe Lower Bounds
Computational Complexity
Makes computer programs run much faster.
Lower Bounds for Linear Operators
Computational Complexity
Makes computers faster at math problems.
Ideals, Gröbner Bases, and PCPs
Computational Complexity
Simplifies computer code checking with fewer steps.