De mythe van geïnformeerde toestemming: online privacybescherming kan beter [Informed Consent: We Can Do Better to Defend Privacy]
By: Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius
We need to rethink our approach to defend privacy on the internet. Currently, policymakers focus heavily on the idea of informed consent as a means to defend privacy. For instance, in many countries the law requires firms to obtain an individual's consent before they use data about her; with such informed consent requirements, the law aims to empower people to make privacy choices in their best interests. But behavioural studies cast doubt on this approach's effectiveness, as people tend to click OK to almost any request they see on their screens. To improve privacy protection, this article argues for a combined approach of protecting and empowering the individual. This article discusses practical problems with informed consent as a means to protect privacy, and illustrates the problems with current data privacy rules regarding behavioural targeting. First, the privacy problems of behavioural targeting, and the central role of informed consent in privacy law are discussed. Following that, practical problems with informed consent are highlighted. Then, the article argues that policymakers should give more attention to rules that protect, rather than empower, people.
Similar Papers
Mensen aanwijzen maar niet bij naam noemen: behavioural targeting, persoonsgegevens, en de nieuwe Privacyverordening
Computers and Society
Protects your online information from targeted ads.
Behavioural Sciences and the Regulation of Privacy on the Internet
Computers and Society
Stops websites from tracking you for ads.
"Nobody should control the end user": Exploring Privacy Perspectives of Indian Internet Users in Light of DPDPA
Human-Computer Interaction
Helps people understand online privacy rules better.