The relationship between offline partisan geographical segregation and online partisan segregation
By: Megan A. Brown , Tiago Ventura , Joshua A. Tucker and more
Potential Business Impact:
Offline groups are more divided than online ones.
Social media is often blamed for the creation of echo chambers. However, these claims fail to consider the prevalence of offline echo chambers resulting from high levels of partisan segregation in the United States. Our article empirically assesses these online versus offline dynamics by linking a novel dataset of voters' offline partisan segregation extracted from publicly available voter files for 180 million US voters with their online network segregation on Twitter. We investigate offline and online partisan segregation using measures of geographical and network isolation of every matched voter-twitter user to their co-partisans online and offline. Our results show that while social media users tend to form politically homogeneous online networks, these levels of partisan sorting are significantly lower than those found in offline settings. Notably, Democrats are more isolated than Republicans in both settings, and only older Republicans exhibit higher online than offline segregation. Our results contribute to the emerging literature on political communication and the homophily of online networks, providing novel evidence on partisan sorting both online and offline.
Similar Papers
The relationship between offline partisan geographical segregation and online partisan segregation
Social and Information Networks
Online political groups are less separate than real-life ones.
Why Are Some Countries More Politically Fragmented Online Than Others?
Social and Information Networks
Shows how online groups split apart or stick together.
What Contributes to Affective Polarization in Networked Online Environments? Evidence from an Agent-Based Model
Multiagent Systems
Shows how online sharing makes people dislike other groups more.