AgentEval: Generative Agents as Reliable Proxies for Human Evaluation of AI-Generated Content
By: Thanh Vu, Richi Nayak, Thiru Balasubramaniam
Modern businesses are increasingly challenged by the time and expense required to generate and assess high-quality content. Human writers face time constraints, and extrinsic evaluations can be costly. While Large Language Models (LLMs) offer potential in content creation, concerns about the quality of AI-generated content persist. Traditional evaluation methods, like human surveys, further add operational costs, highlighting the need for efficient, automated solutions. This research introduces Generative Agents as a means to tackle these challenges. These agents can rapidly and cost-effectively evaluate AI-generated content, simulating human judgment by rating aspects such as coherence, interestingness, clarity, fairness, and relevance. By incorporating these agents, businesses can streamline content generation and ensure consistent, high-quality output while minimizing reliance on costly human evaluations. The study provides critical insights into enhancing LLMs for producing business-aligned, high-quality content, offering significant advancements in automated content generation and evaluation.
Similar Papers
When AIs Judge AIs: The Rise of Agent-as-a-Judge Evaluation for LLMs
Artificial Intelligence
AI judges check other AI's work for mistakes.
From Digital Distrust to Codified Honesty: Experimental Evidence on Generative AI in Credence Goods Markets
General Economics
AI experts earn more, but hurt customers.
Assessing the Potential of Generative Agents in Crowdsourced Fact-Checking
Computation and Language
Computers check if online stories are true.