Refuting "Debunking the GAMLSS Myth: Simplicity Reigns in Pulmonary Function Diagnostics"
By: Robert A. Rigby , Mikis D. Stasinopoulos , Achim Zeileis and more
Potential Business Impact:
Tests lung power more easily and accurately.
We read with interest the above article by Zavorsky (2025, Respiratory Medicine, doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107836) concerning reference equations for pulmonary function testing. The author compares a Generalized Additive Model for Location, Scale, and Shape (GAMLSS), which is the standard adopted by the Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI), with a segmented linear regression (SLR) model, for pulmonary function variables. The author presents an interesting comparison; however there are some fundamental issues with the approach. We welcome this opportunity for discussion of the issues that it raises. The author's contention is that (1) SLR provides "prediction accuracies on par with GAMLSS"; and (2) the GAMLSS model equations are "complicated and require supplementary spline tables", whereas the SLR is "more straightforward, parsimonious, and accessible to a broader audience". We respectfully disagree with both of these points.
Similar Papers
Subject-Adaptive Sparse Linear Models for Interpretable Personalized Health Prediction from Multimodal Lifelog Data
Machine Learning (CS)
Helps doctors predict your health better.
The Mixed-Sparse-Smooth-Model Toolbox (MSSM): Efficient Estimation and Selection of Large Multi-Level Statistical Models
Methodology
Helps computers build complex models faster.
A novel generalized additive scalar-on-function regression model for partially observed multidimensional functional data: An application to air quality classification
Methodology
Helps computers understand messy data with missing parts.