OpenProposal Platform for Transparent Research Funding Review
By: Sakshi Ahuja, Subhankar Mishra
Research funding allocation remains a critical bottleneck in scientific advancement, yet the review process for funding proposals lacks the transparency that has revolutionized academic paper peer review. Traditional funding agencies operate with closed review systems, limiting accountability and preventing systematic improvements. We present OpenProposal, a proof-of-concept web-based platform that explores how transparency principles from OpenReview might be adapted to research funding proposal evaluation. Built using modern web technologies including Next.js , React , and Prisma , OpenProposal demonstrates the technical feasibility of public reviews, author rebuttals, and transparent decision-making while attempting to protect sensitive information such as budgets. Our platform prototype addresses key limitations identified in current funding systems by providing mechanisms for community engagement, reviewer accountability, and potential data-driven insights into peer review processes. Through system design and implementation, we explore how transparent funding review could potentially enhance scientific integrity and improve research funding decisions, though empirical validation remains necessary. This work contributes a technical foundation for transparent funding review and identifies design considerations for future research on peer review mechanisms in funding contexts.
Similar Papers
Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship
Computers and Society
Makes science ideas better with open feedback.
What Drives Paper Acceptance? A Process-Centric Analysis of Modern Peer Review
Computers and Society
Makes papers more likely to be accepted.
Reforming research funding: Combining editorial preregistration with grant peer review
Digital Libraries
Helps scientists get money for bold, new ideas.