TCP BBR Performance over Wi-Fi~6: AQM Impacts and Cross-Layer Insights
By: Shyam Kumar Shrestha, Shiva Raj Pokhrel, Jonathan Kua
We evaluate TCP BBRv3 on Wi-Fi 6 home networks under modern AQM schemes using a fully wireless testbed and a simple cross-layer model linking Wi-Fi scheduling, router queueing, and BBRv3's pacing dynamics. Comparing BBR Internet traffic with CUBIC across different AQMs (FIFO, FQ-CoDel, and CAKE) for uplink, downlink, and bidirectional traffic, we find that FIFO destabilizes pacing and raises delay, often letting CUBIC dominate; FQ-CoDel restores fairness and controls latency; and CAKE delivers the best overall performance by keeping delay low and aligning BBRv3's sending and delivered rates. We also identify a Wi-Fi-specific effect where CAKE's rapid queue draining, while improving pacing alignment, can trigger brief retransmission bursts during BBRv3's bandwidth probes. These results follow from the interaction of variable Wi-Fi service rates, AQM delay control, and BBRv3's inflight limits, leading to practical guidance to use FQ-CoDel or CAKE and avoid unmanaged FIFO in home Wi-Fi, with potential for Wi-Fi-aware tuning of BBRv3's probing.
Similar Papers
Understanding BBRv3 Performance in AQM-Enabled WiFi Networks
Networking and Internet Architecture
Makes Wi-Fi faster and fairer for everyone.
Should BBR be the default TCP Congestion Control Protocol?
Networking and Internet Architecture
Makes internet faster for big downloads.
From 5G RAN Queue Dynamics to Playback: A Performance Analysis for QUIC Video Streaming
Networking and Internet Architecture
Makes online videos stream better on fast phones.