A Bayesian likely responder approach for the analysis of randomized controlled trials
By: Annan Deng, Carole Siegel, Hyung G. Park
An important goal of precision medicine is to personalize medical treatment by identifying individuals who are most likely to benefit from a specific treatment. The Likely Responder (LR) framework, which identifies a subpopulation where treatment response is expected to exceed a certain clinical threshold, plays a role in this effort. However, the LR framework, and more generally, data-driven subgroup analyses, often fail to account for uncertainty in the estimation of model-based data-driven subgrouping. We propose a simple two-stage approach that integrates subgroup identification with subsequent subgroup-specific inference on treatment effects. We incorporate model estimation uncertainty from the first stage into subgroup-specific treatment effect estimation in the second stage, by utilizing Bayesian posterior distributions from the first stage. We evaluate our method through simulations, demonstrating that the proposed Bayesian two-stage model produces better calibrated confidence intervals than naïve approaches. We apply our method to an international COVID-19 treatment trial, which shows substantial variation in treatment effects across data-driven subgroups.
Similar Papers
Decision Theoretic Subgroup Detection With Bayesian Machine Learning
Methodology
Finds best medicine groups for patients.
Data-driven controlled subgroup selection in clinical trials
Methodology
Finds best patient groups for medicine.
Calibrated Bayes analysis of cluster-randomized trials
Methodology
Makes study results more trustworthy, even with bad guesses.