Sensitivity Analysis of the Consistency Assumption
By: Brian Knaeble , Qinyun Lin , Erich Kummerfeld and more
Sensitivity analysis informs causal inference by assessing the sensitivity of conclusions to departures from assumptions. The consistency assumption states that there are no hidden versions of treatment and that the outcome arising naturally equals the outcome arising from intervention. When reasoning about the possibility of consistency violations, it can be helpful to distinguish between covariates and versions of treatment. In the context of surgery, for example, genomic variables are covariates and the skill of a particular surgeon is a version of treatment. There may be hidden versions of treatment, and this paper addresses that concern with a new kind of sensitivity analysis. Whereas many methods for sensitivity analysis are focused on confounding by unmeasured covariates, the methodology of this paper is focused on confounding by hidden versions of treatment. In this paper, new mathematical notation is introduced to support the novel method, and example applications are described.
Similar Papers
Sensitivity Analysis to Unobserved Confounders: A Comparative Review to Estimate Confounding Strength in Sensitivity Models
Methodology
Find hidden causes even with missing information.
Bayesian Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Estimation with Time-varying Unmeasured Confounding
Methodology
Find hidden causes affecting health results.
A Sensitivity Analysis Framework for Causal Inference Under Interference
Methodology
Finds hidden problems affecting results.