Fairness-Aware Insurance Pricing: A Multi-Objective Optimization Approach
By: Tim J. Boonen, Xinyue Fan, Zixiao Quan
Machine learning improves predictive accuracy in insurance pricing but exacerbates trade-offs between competing fairness criteria across different discrimination measures, challenging regulators and insurers to reconcile profitability with equitable outcomes. While existing fairness-aware models offer partial solutions under GLM and XGBoost estimation methods, they remain constrained by single-objective optimization, failing to holistically navigate a conflicting landscape of accuracy, group fairness, individual fairness, and counterfactual fairness. To address this, we propose a novel multi-objective optimization framework that jointly optimizes all four criteria via the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), generating a diverse Pareto front of trade-off solutions. We use a specific selection mechanism to extract a premium on this front. Our results show that XGBoost outperforms GLM in accuracy but amplifies fairness disparities; the Orthogonal model excels in group fairness, while Synthetic Control leads in individual and counterfactual fairness. Our method consistently achieves a balanced compromise, outperforming single-model approaches.
Similar Papers
A Multi-Objective Evaluation Framework for Analyzing Utility-Fairness Trade-Offs in Machine Learning Systems
Machine Learning (CS)
Helps AI make fair choices, showing pros and cons.
Alternative Fairness and Accuracy Optimization in Criminal Justice
Machine Learning (CS)
Helps judges make fairer decisions about people.
Alternative Fairness and Accuracy Optimization in Criminal Justice
Machine Learning (CS)
Makes AI fairer when judging people.