The unsuitability of existing regulations to reach sustainable AI
By: Thomas Le Goff
Potential Business Impact:
Regulates AI's environmental harm better.
This paper examines the European Union's emerging regulatory landscape - focusing on the AI Act, corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence regimes (CSRD and CSDDD), and data center regulation - to assess whether it can effectively govern AI's environmental footprint. We argue that, despite incremental progress, current approaches remain ill-suited to correcting the market failures underpinning AI-related energy use, water consumption, and material demand. Key shortcomings include narrow disclosure requirements, excessive reliance on voluntary standards, weak enforcement mechanisms, and a structural disconnect between AI-specific impacts and broader sustainability laws. The analysis situates these regulatory gaps within a wider ecosystem of academic research, civil society advocacy, standard-setting, and industry initiatives, highlighting risks of regulatory capture and greenwashing. Building on this diagnosis, the paper advances strategic recommendations for the COP30 Action Agenda, calling for binding transparency obligations, harmonized international standards for lifecycle assessment, stricter governance of data center expansion, and meaningful public participation in AI infrastructure decisions.
Similar Papers
How Do Companies Manage the Environmental Sustainability of AI? An Interview Study About Green AI Efforts and Regulations
Computers and Society
Makes AI use less harmful to the planet.
Position Paper: If Innovation in AI Systematically Violates Fundamental Rights, Is It Innovation at All?
Computers and Society
Makes AI safer and more trustworthy for everyone.
Assessing High-Risk Systems: An EU AI Act Verification Framework
Computers and Society
Helps check if AI follows the law.