Score: 1

Seeing through the Conflict: Transparent Knowledge Conflict Handling in Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Published: January 11, 2026 | arXiv ID: 2601.06842v1

By: Hua Ye , Siyuan Chen , Ziqi Zhong and more

Potential Business Impact:

Fixes AI mistakes by checking facts and showing its work.

Business Areas:
Semantic Search Internet Services

Large language models (LLMs) equipped with retrieval--the Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) paradigm--should combine their parametric knowledge with external evidence, yet in practice they often hallucinate, over-trust noisy snippets, or ignore vital context. We introduce TCR (Transparent Conflict Resolution), a plug-and-play framework that makes this decision process observable and controllable. TCR (i) disentangles semantic match and factual consistency via dual contrastive encoders, (ii) estimates self-answerability to gauge confidence in internal memory, and (iii) feeds the three scalar signals to the generator through a lightweight soft-prompt with SNR-based weighting. Across seven benchmarks TCR improves conflict detection (+5-18 F1), raises knowledge-gap recovery by +21.4 pp and cuts misleading-context overrides by -29.3 pp, while adding only 0.3% parameters. The signals align with human judgements and expose temporal decision patterns.

Country of Origin
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Singapore, United States, United Kingdom, China

Page Count
9 pages

Category
Computer Science:
Artificial Intelligence