LRAS: Advanced Legal Reasoning with Agentic Search
By: Yujin Zhou , Chuxue Cao , Jinluan Yang and more
Potential Business Impact:
Helps AI understand and follow complex laws.
While Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated exceptional logical capabilities in mathematical domains, their application to the legal field remains hindered by the strict requirements for procedural rigor and adherence to legal logic. Existing legal LLMs, which rely on "closed-loop reasoning" derived solely from internal parametric knowledge, frequently suffer from lack of self-awareness regarding their knowledge boundaries, leading to confident yet incorrect conclusions. To address this challenge, we present Legal Reasoning with Agentic Search (LRAS), the first framework designed to transition legal LLMs from static and parametric "closed-loop thinking" to dynamic and interactive "Active Inquiry". By integrating Introspective Imitation Learning and Difficulty-aware Reinforcement Learning, LRAS enables LRMs to identify knowledge boundaries and handle legal reasoning complexity. Empirical results demonstrate that LRAS outperforms state-of-the-art baselines by 8.2-32\%, with the most substantial gains observed in tasks requiring deep reasoning with reliable knowledge. We will release our data and models for further exploration soon.
Similar Papers
Exploring the Necessity of Reasoning in LLM-based Agent Scenarios
Artificial Intelligence
New AI thinks better, but sometimes too much.
Judicial Requirements for Generative AI in Legal Reasoning
Artificial Intelligence
Helps AI understand and argue legal cases.
Towards Trustworthy Legal AI through LLM Agents and Formal Reasoning
Artificial Intelligence
Makes AI judge cases fairly and explain why.