Measuring the benefits of lying in MARA under egalitarian social welfare
By: Jonathan Carrero, Ismael Rodriguez, Fernando Rubio
When some resources are to be distributed among a set of agents following egalitarian social welfare, the goal is to maximize the utility of the agent whose utility turns out to be minimal. In this context, agents can have an incentive to lie about their actual preferences, so that more valuable resources are assigned to them. In this paper we analyze this situation, and we present a practical study where genetic algorithms are used to assess the benefits of lying under different situations.
Similar Papers
Fair Multi-agent Persuasion with Submodular Constraints
CS and Game Theory
Helps decide who gets what fairly.
Fair Multi-agent Persuasion with Submodular Constraints
CS and Game Theory
Helps decide who gets what fairly and smartly.
Incentive Analysis of Collusion in Fair Division
CS and Game Theory
Stops groups from cheating to get more than their fair share.