Democracy and Distrust in an Era of Artificial Intelligence
By: Sonia Katyal
Potential Business Impact:
Protects people from unfair computer decisions.
This essay examines how judicial review should adapt to address challenges posed by artificial intelligence decision-making, particularly regarding minority rights and interests. As I argue in this essay, the rise of three trends-privatization, prediction, and automation in AI-have combined to pose similar risks to minorities. Here, I outline what a theory of judicial review would look like in an era of artificial intelligence, analyzing both the limitations and the possibilities of judicial review of AI. I draw on cases in which AI decision-making has been challenged in courts, to show how concepts of due process and equal protection can be recuperated in a modern AI era, and even integrated into AI, to provide for better oversight and accountability, offering a framework for judicial review in the AI era that protects minorities from algorithmic discrimination.
Similar Papers
Ethical Challenges of Using Artificial Intelligence in Judiciary
Machine Learning (CS)
Helps courts make fair decisions faster and cheaper.
Discrimination, artificial intelligence, and algorithmic decision-making
Computers and Society
AI can unfairly treat people, this study warns.
Concerning the Responsible Use of AI in the US Criminal Justice System
Computers and Society
Makes AI in courts explain its decisions fairly.