The incompatibility of the Condorcet winner and loser criteria with positive involvement and resolvability
By: Wesley H. Holliday
We prove that there is no preferential voting method satisfying the Condorcet winner and loser criteria, positive involvement (if a candidate $x$ wins in an initial preference profile, then adding a voter who ranks $x$ uniquely first cannot cause $x$ to lose), and resolvability (if $x$ initially ties for winning, then $x$ can be made the unique winner by adding a single voter). In a previous note, we proved an analogous result assuming an additional axiom of ordinal margin invariance, which we now show is unnecessary for an impossibility theorem, at least if the desired voting method is defined for five-candidate elections.
Similar Papers
Axiomatizations of a simple Condorcet voting method for Final Four and Final Five elections
Theoretical Economics
Chooses the best election winner when no one clearly wins.
Axiomatizations of a simple Condorcet voting method for Final Four and Final Five elections
Theoretical Economics
Finds best winner when no one clearly wins.
Approximately Dominating Sets in Elections
CS and Game Theory
Finds a few good winners even in tricky elections.