Epistemic Control and the Normativity of Machine Learning-Based Science
By: Emanuele Ratti
Potential Business Impact:
Lets scientists stay in charge of discoveries.
The past few years have witnessed an increasing use of machine learning (ML) systems in science. Paul Humphreys has argued that, because of specific characteristics of ML systems, human scientists are pushed out of the loop of science. In this chapter, I investigate to what extent this is true. First, I express these concerns in terms of what I call epistemic control. I identify two conditions for epistemic control, called tracking and tracing, drawing on works in philosophy of technology. With this new understanding of the problem, I then argue against Humphreys pessimistic view. Finally, I construct a more nuanced view of epistemic control in ML-based science.
Similar Papers
Epistemological Fault Lines Between Human and Artificial Intelligence
Computers and Society
Computers can sound smart but don't truly understand.
Epistemic Artificial Intelligence is Essential for Machine Learning Models to Truly 'Know When They Do Not Know'
Artificial Intelligence
AI learns to admit when it doesn't know.
Virtuous Machines: Towards Artificial General Science
Artificial Intelligence
AI does science experiments and writes papers alone.